Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Ellis Amdur on “Irimi”

I recently read a post which includes an oft-used phrase - “get off the line and enter.” Not only does this phrase not do full justice to the concept of irimi (I confess I’ve used it myself), it leads to a mistaken understanding of aikido technique. This mistake is not only intellectual, but expressed physically, probably lies at the root of the technical deficiencies that are, allegedly, so rife in aikido.

“Getting off the line,” at least as most people I’ve observed excute it, is reactive. We side-step, get out of the way of the attack, etc. Irimi is then imagined to be a counter-attack on an angle - martial arts as the application of geometry, so to speak.

In Japanese, reactive counters are often called “go no sen,” which is a counter to the other’s initiative, but even this is not accurate. In fact, reactive counters are commemorated with tombstones.

In Go no sen, one takes the initiative away from the other and rules him. Imagine a conversation in which someone raises his voice, and in the middle of his tirade, I hold my hand up and out and say, “Not one more word. Be still.” And they are silent. An argument is reactive, as in, “I don’t like your tone of voice! And you are wrong,” to which they reply again, and I respond to that. An argument is often referred to as verbal sparring or verbal fencing. Go no sen is dominant - one cut, one life.

One place we see this is in kenjutsu, and an exemplar of it is in Itto-ryu (remember the deep ties that Itto-ryu has with Daito-ryu). As the enemy cuts, so, too, do I cut. Not “along” the same path. ON THE SAME PATH. Two objects cannot occupy the same space, and I, with greater power/speed/timing/postural stability, etc, take that space. The enemy is, ostensibly, deflected, but they are NOT knocked away. They are simply not allowed to occupy that space. And often there is no tai-sabaki (body displacement, getting off line). There might be. If there is, it is simultaneous - not one following the other. But even beyond that, tai-sabaki is not part of the fundamental definition of irimi, simply an elaboration of it.

Irimi in aikido occupies space the same way. This, by the way, is the true essence of atemi - not pugilism - but using the body (particularly the limbs) to take space the opponent is trying to occupy. Sometimes one steps off line, but sometimes one steps across line or even in line. Like a swimmer diving right in the belly of a breaking wave. Like Shioda Gozo in one of his favorite techniqes where, in respond to a two-hand grasp, he steps in with suddenly rigid downward arms and the opponent, bounces upwards and away. Like Nishio Shoji in that subtle little twist he did with his wrist at the moment he was grasped, creating a small but inexorable wave of recoil (kuzushi) into his partner. Like Kuwamori Yasunori used to do with his hips, taking the place right where your advancing thigh was about to occupy in his wonderful koshinage. Like Chuck Clark in the way he puts that meaty fist right where your head is about to be. All irimi with no moving off line whatsoever.

Aikido technique - that which we practice so much, and seems so open to criticism by folks who recommend adding a touch of boxing and a tad of judo - is the EFFECT, not the essence of aikido. Properly, technique drops in one’s hands after the aikido’s already been done.

And tenkan? I’ve written on this elsewhere, but in brief. Tenkan imagined as spinning away/finesse/leading into a circular path is not part of aikido. Merely part of fantasy played out on the mat. Tenkan is always preceded by irimi. The opponent is so skilled or powerful that even as irimi takes his space, he is wrapping around it/taking the space back, and so one wraps them in a circular motion/technique. Because irimi did take their center - if only momentarily -he’s got to “go around.” The circular motion starts with him. Tenkan is like taking hold of a planet and adding speed and some ellipse or spiral or tangent to its circular revolution. Aikido ura techniques (tenkan) take the person on a tangent - inward or outward - to their circular path. Tenkan should be described as spiral, not circular - it is the permutations of an initial circle once we have taken it over. But if irimi had not already won half or more of the battle, there would be no tenkan to accomplish. You would simply be defeated.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Transmission, Inheritance, Emulation (XIII)

Ya se encuentra disponible el capítulo 13 de la serie Transmission, Inheritance, Emulation de Peter Goldsbury Sensei.

¡Y cada vez se pone más difícil...!

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Morihiro Saito sobre el Atemi en Aikido

Extraigo lo siguiente del blog de Enrique Oliva, excelente aikidoka y amigo. Dedicado especialmente a quienes dicen que el Atemi no tiene cabida en el Aikido.

Stanley Pranin entrevistando a Saito Shihan en Marzo de 1991, le preguntó entre otras cosas lo siguiente:

Desde un punto de vista histórico, pienso que el aikido evolucionó de situaciones en las que los samurái no podían hacer uso de su espada. Algunos críticos dicen que el aikido no funcionaría contra sistemas de pelea modernos, como el karate. ¿Qué opina usted?

El aikido incluye tanto dori (técnicas para apoderarse de la espada corta), tachi dori (técnicas para apoderarse de la espada) y jo dori (técnicas para apoderarse del bastón). Durante esas técnicas, si tú permites que el filo de un arma llegue a tocar tu cuerpo podrías morir, mientras que un puñetazo o una patada no te matarán excepto que golpeen en algún punto vital. La espada sólo necesita hacer un ligero contacto para herir seriamente o matar; aún así, practicamos cómo defendernos contra la espada con nuestras manos vacías. Si siempre tenemos esto en mente, será un entrenamiento valioso.

¿Considera usted que el aikido sin atemi puede ser efectivo contra un ataque fuerte?

El aikido incluye al atemi, aunque, por supuesto, el entrenamiento no es igual que la realidad, así que no aplicamos atemi por completo en el dojo. En el taijutsu, el atemi es un elemento vital que enfatizamos en nuestro dojo.

En el aikido el atemi es empleado contra el ataque con un arma, así pues, ¿cree usted que es deseable para un aikidoka aprender cómo hacer frente a las patadas de karate, ahora que los ataques de este tipo son empleados a menudo?

Sí, creo que deberían aprenderse. No es algo que se deba evitar. Existen muchas técnicas básicas que nos permiten enfrentar al karate, como el tsuki y el yokomen uchi.

Un grupo establecido por uno de mis estudiantes realiza un tipo de defensa contra los ataques del karate, y es muy interesante. Un hombre con 4º dan —tanto en aikido como en judo— esquiva los ataques de karate y avanza para proyectar o controlar a su atacante en una espléndida demostración de técnicas de aikido. También recomendaría una práctica abundante en técnicas como yokomen uchi y tachi dori.

Pone usted un fuerte énfasis en las armas y basa sus enseñanzas en los principios de la espada. ¿Qué opina usted de la actual situación del aikido en otras partes?

No conozco otro aikido que no sea el de O-Sensei. Recibí enseñanza de O-Sensei desde los 18 y hasta los 41 años, y le serví del mismo modo que lo hace un discípulo interno (uchideshi), así que no conozco ningún otro maestro. Muchos shihan crean nuevas técnicas y creo que esto es algo maravilloso, pero después de analizarlas todavía estoy convencido que nadie puede superar a O-Sensei. Creo que es mejor seguir la forma que nos dejó.

En estos tiempos la gente se inclina a tomar su propio camino pero, mientras yo siga involucrado, voy a continuar ejecutando las técnicas y formas que O-Sensei nos dejó.